5 Comments
User's avatar
Charles Hardin's avatar

Learning a bit of bayesian modeling in school, and I was initially a bit confused on the reasoning for applying priors & bayesian thinking to player ratings but after reading it makes a lot of sense. This is brilliant.

Evan Miyakawa's avatar

Thank you so much!

Jeremy's avatar

Zach Edey appears in the all time list TWICE. I guess a lot of the top guys go straight to the NBA, but not a single one of the other guys turned in two Top 30 BPR performances?

So is it best all-time SEASONS/PEFORMANCES, then, and not best PLAYERS? Zach Edey is only one player.

I'm pretty sure.

Ron's avatar

What makes this model Bayesian?

Evan Miyakawa's avatar

This means two things:

1. The output of every model is not just a point estimate (single value), it's actually a probability distribution. So you can know not just the best guess at a player's value, but all the possible "true" values. All bayesian models also require prior distributions for each coefficient as well, which I mention in the article

2. The computation itself has to be done through some bayesian computation method. That's a bit more of a complicated subject, but if you do some googling you can learn more about that.